Re: BLOB's bypassing the OS Filesystem for better Image loading speed?
От | PFC |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BLOB's bypassing the OS Filesystem for better Image loading speed? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | op.sqnp66onth1vuj@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BLOB's bypassing the OS Filesystem for better Image loading speed? (Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
>> Filesystems with many Filesystem Objects can slow down the Performance >> at opening and reading Data. On my laptop, lighttpd takes upto 15000 hits PER SECOND on static 2-3 Kb files (tested with apachebench 2). Apache is slower, of course : 3-4000 hits per second which is not that bad. Using a dynamic script with images in the database, you should account for query and transmission overhead, dynamic page overhead... mmm, I'd say using a fast application server you could maybe get 2-300 images served per second from the database, and that's very optimistic. And then the database will crawl, it will be disintegrated by the incoming flow of useless requests... scalability will be awful... Not mentioning that browsers ask the server "has this image changed since the last time ?" (HEAD request) and then they don't download it if it doesn't. The server just stat()'s the file. statting a file on any decent filesystem (ie. XFS Reiser JFS etc.) should take less than 10 microseconds if the information is in the cache. You'll have to look in the database to check the date... more queries ! If you want to control download rights on files, you can still put the files on the filesystem (which is the right choice IMHO) and use a dynamic script to serve them. Even better, you could use lighttpd's authorized file download feature. The only case I see putting files in a database as interesting is if you want them to be part of a transaction. In that case, why not...
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: