Re: wal sync method
| От | PFC |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: wal sync method |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | op.s5qgvjilcigqcu@apollo13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: wal sync method (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Hm, i seem to have mixed fwrite() (which buffers data in userspace) and
write() (which apparently doesnt !)
Sorry !
> PFC <lists@peufeu.com> writes:
>> Just a stupid question about the various fsync settings.
>> There is fsync=off, but is there fsync=fflush ?
>> fflush would mean only an OS crash could cause data loss,
>> I think.it could be useful for some applications where you need a speed
>> boost (like testing database import scripts...) without being as scary
>> as
>> fsync=off...
>
> I think you misunderstand. There aren't any scenarios where a PG crash
> (without hardware/OS crash) risks data, because we always at least
> write() data before commit. The only issue is how hard do we try to get
> the OS+hardware to push that data down to disk.
>
> regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: