Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
| От | PFC |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | op.s39morhucigqcu@apollo13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
>> Linux does balanced reads on software
>> mirrors. I'm not sure why you think this can't improve bandwidth. It
>> does improve streaming bandwidth as long as the platter STR is more than
>> the bus STR.
>
> ... Prove it.
>
(I have a software RAID1 on this desktop machine)
It's a lot faster than a single disk for random reads when more than 1
thread hits the disk, because it distributes reads to both disks. Thus,
applications start faster, and the machine is more reactive even when the
disk is thrashing. Cron starting a "updatedb" is less painful. It's cool
for desktop use (and of course it's more reliable).
However large reads (dd-style) are just the same speed as 1 drive. I
guess you'd need a humongous readahead in order to read from both disks.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: