Re: LIMIT causes planner to do Index Scan using a less optimal index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: LIMIT causes planner to do Index Scan using a less optimal index
Дата
Msg-id o2k603c8f071004061133qbfeccea6iec13efdbc3c080d7@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на LIMIT causes planner to do Index Scan using a less optimal index  (Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com> wrote:
> Is this a bug? I'm using version 8.4.1.

It's not really a bug, but it's definitely not a feature either.

>  Limit  (cost=0.00..43.46 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=1023.213..1023.214
> rows=1 loops=1)
>    ->  Index Scan using transactions_pkey on transactions
>  (cost=0.00..493029.74 rows=11345 width=4) (actual time=1023.212..1023.212
> rows=1 loops=1)
>          Filter: ((accountid = 108) AND (currency = 'SEK'::bpchar))
>  Total runtime: 1023.244 ms
> (4 rows)

The planner's idea here is that rows matching the filter criteria will
be common enough that an index scan over transactions_pkey will find
one fairly quickly, at which point the executor can return that row
and stop.  But it turns out that those rows aren't as common as the
planner thinks, so the search takes a long time.

...Robert

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ireneusz Pluta
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID
Следующее
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Some question