Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
| От | Erik Wienhold |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | n5j5tsqbh55orr36bhpibcd7k3ckztsu75q4uhmmncbpedu4ok@vib6inzin3el обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
On 2023-11-15 08:16 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The SQL standard does not refer to ISO 8601 to define date formats, it has > its own definitions. In fact, PostgreSQL implements more date formats than > the SQL standard requires. Really? Then what does the standard mean with section "Definitions taken from ISO 8601" which I quoted in [1]? Just using the term "date" without adopting its syntax? And the Postgres docs also say "The SQL standard requires the use of the ISO 8601 format." [2] [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/piavtdd7mhmkpzpgvxaek3hz3e2kan3c2fitn5iqta6nyrpgyl%40txongxshxkxw [2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-DATETIME-OUTPUT -- Erik
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: