Hello,
I stumbled over this answer: http://stackoverflow.com/a/9717125/330315 and this sounded quite strange to me.
So I ran this on my Windows laptop with Postgres 9.4.5, 64bit and indeed now()::date is much faster than current_date:
explain analyze
select current_date
from generate_series (1, 1000000);
Function Scan on generate_series (cost=0.00..6.00 rows=1000 width=0) (actual time=243.878..1451.839 rows=1000000
loops=1)
Planning time: 0.047 ms
Execution time: 1517.881 ms
And:
explain analyze
select now()::date
from generate_series (1, 1000000);
Function Scan on generate_series (cost=0.00..6.00 rows=1000 width=0) (actual time=244.491..785.819 rows=1000000
loops=1)
Planning time: 0.037 ms
Execution time: 826.612 ms
Running this on a CentOS 6.6. test server (Postgres 9.4.1, 64bit), there is still a difference, but not as big as on
Windows:
explain analyze
select current_date
from generate_series (1, 1000000);
Function Scan on generate_series (cost=0.00..15.00 rows=1000 width=0) (actual time=233.599..793.032 rows=1000000
loops=1)
Planning time: 0.087 ms
Execution time: 850.198 ms
And
explain analyze
select now()::date
from generate_series (1, 1000000);
Function Scan on generate_series (cost=0.00..15.00 rows=1000 width=0) (actual time=198.385..570.171 rows=1000000
loops=1)
Planning time: 0.074 ms
Execution time: 623.211 ms
Any ideas?