Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Kellerer
Тема Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?
Дата
Msg-id mnlsi2$oh8$1@ger.gmane.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?  ("Graeme B. Bell" <graeme.bell@nibio.no>)
Ответы Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?
Список pgsql-performance
Graeme B. Bell schrieb am 09.07.2015 um 11:44:
> I don't recall seeing a clear statement telling me I should mark pl/pgsql
> functions nonvolatile wherever possible or throw all performance and
> scalability out the window.

From: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/xfunc-volatility.html

   "For best optimization results, you should label your functions
    with the strictest volatility category that is valid for them."



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?
Следующее
От: "Graeme B. Bell"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?