Re: purpose of exe?
| От | Mark Morgan Lloyd |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: purpose of exe? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | mhv7t8$q08$1@pye-srv-01.telemetry.co.uk обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: purpose of exe? (Christian Ullrich <chris@chrullrich.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-odbc |
Christian Ullrich wrote: > * Adrian Klaver wrote: > >> On 04/29/2015 07:08 PM, Josh Hester wrote: >>> Hi, can you explain the purpose of the exe wrapper around the two msi >>> files? Will there be a move away from msi files in the future? > >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/545233FC.9070502@winpg.jp > > That doesn't actually *explain* anything, it just states a fact with no > rationale behind it. > > There are those of us who use some automated deployment method to > install the driver; having to extract the packages from the wrapper > first is just needless effort. > > Yes, in principle I can deploy the wrapper executable. Except if I want > to apply an external transform to the package, which I do. > > There may actually be some software in the world where MSI simply can't > do the job. I have a hard time believing that an ODBC driver that drops > maybe ten files and the same number of registry keys belongs in that > category. > > I have no objection to that wrapper existing, I just don't want to use > it. Please provide the individual MSIs as well. I agree. There's a perennial problem where software is OK for some older version of OS, but the installer quite simply won't run on it. Adding an extra layer is highly undesirable. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: