* Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> Btw, perhaps this diff should be pushed as a different patch as this is a
>> rather different thing:
>> - if (heapRelation->rd_rel->relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED
>> &&
>> + if (indexRelation->rd_rel->relpersistence ==
>> RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED &&
>> !smgrexists(indexRelation->rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM)
>> As this is a correctness fix, it does not seem necessary to back-patch it:
>> the parent relation always has the same persistence as its indexes.
>
> There was an argument for doing it this way that only applies if this
> patch went in, but I can't remember now what it was.
>
> Anyway I pushed the patch after some slight additional changes. Thanks!
The buildfarm says -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS does not like this patch.
--
Christian