jean-paul@argudo.org (Jean-Paul Argudo) wrote:
> I know PG is not a political movement, it hasn't to be one. But will
> we stay and wait the "final headshot", or just stand up and say "we
> are against patents"?
There _is_ a problem with doing so, organisationally, as that does
make the organisation more or less political in nature. And that
can disqualify it from being treated as a charitable organisation.
Nothing here prevents individuals from participating in political
endeavours, so those that are so interested are free to do so.
--
(format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "gmail.com")
http://linuxfinances.info/info/slony.html
"It goes against the grain of modern education to teach children to
program. What fun is there in making plans, acquiring discipline in
organising thoughts, devoting attention to detail and learning to be
self-critical?" -- Alan Perlis