Re: Question about bit.h and bit.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sailesh Krishnamurthy
Тема Re: Question about bit.h and bit.c
Дата
Msg-id m3smw6yjgj.fsf@datafix.CS.Berkeley.EDU
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Question about bit.h and bit.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Question about bit.h and bit.c  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
   Tom> Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:   >> Why is it that bit.h is in src/include/utils and
bit.cis in   >> src/backend/lib ?
 
   Tom> Possibly a more interesting question is why haven't we   Tom> ditched them both ... AFAICT none of the bit.c
routinesare   Tom> used anymore.
 

True. I just searched and found the only uses of the bitmask functions
(now greatly expanded) in our code :-)

-- 
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Lamar Owen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Upgrading rant.
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...