Re: Question about bit.h and bit.c

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
   Tom> Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:   >> Why is it that bit.h is in src/include/utils and
bit.cis in   >> src/backend/lib ?
 
   Tom> Possibly a more interesting question is why haven't we   Tom> ditched them both ... AFAICT none of the bit.c
routinesare   Tom> used anymore.
 

True. I just searched and found the only uses of the bitmask functions
(now greatly expanded) in our code :-)

-- 
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh