Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT
| От | Doug McNaught |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m3k7ehvj0b.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Accordingly, it's a bad idea to invent now('clock') and make it the
> same function as the other flavors. We could get away with making
> now('transaction') and now('statement') ---- but the argument for this
> was consistency, and that argument pretty much falls flat if those two
> are one function while clock time is something else.
>
> So I'm back in the camp of thinking three separate parameterless
> functions are the way to do it. We already know what now() does,
> and we're not going to change it --- anyone want to propose names
> for the other two?
Maybe clock_time() and statement_time(), with transaction_time() an
alias for now() (if that's seemed necessary)?
A little verbose perhaps, but clear...
-Doug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: