Re: quick review

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Benny Amorsen
Тема Re: quick review
Дата
Msg-id m3k61oo6kf.fsf@ursa.amorsen.dk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на quick review  ("Molle Bestefich" <molle.bestefich@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "BM" == Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

BM> Unless you have buggy hardware, there is no need for a repair
BM> tool. That is our position.

Non-buggy hardware will be more difficult to come by as databases
become larger on commodity hardware. Of course you can define the
problem away by saying that Postgres is only good for enterprises.

Right now file systems are being changed to be more resilient. ZFS
and the Linux working group to replace/extend the ext* series are
examples. Databases will have to follow suit eventually.

There are probably other things with higher priority for Postgres
right now though.


/Benny





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Mitchell
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: advanced index (descending and table-presorted descending)
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: quick review