Re: Explicit configuration file
| От | Doug McNaught |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Explicit configuration file |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m3heqwwspr.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Explicit configuration file (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I wonder if we should go one step further. Should we be specifying the > config file on the command line _rather_ than the data directory. We > could then specify the data directory location in the config file. That > seems like the direction we should be headed in, though I am not sure it > is worth the added headache of the switch. That's what mlw is advocating--all the startup script has to know is the conf file location. I for one think it's totally worth doing, and it won't break any existing setups--if -C (or whatever) isn't specified, postmaster expects PGDATA on the command line and gets the donfig file from there; if it is, PGDATA comes from the config file. -Doug -- Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees. --T. J. Jackson, 1863
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: