Re: [Fwd: Re: PG functions in Java: maybe use gcj?]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Doug McNaught
Тема Re: [Fwd: Re: PG functions in Java: maybe use gcj?]
Дата
Msg-id m3bs5982yj.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [Fwd: Re: PG functions in Java: maybe use gcj?]  (Barry Lind <blind@xythos.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Barry Lind <blind@xythos.com> writes:

> If we had to supply gcj along with PostgreSQL in order for PostgreSQL to
> work, I guess that would mean gcj was incorporated in PostgreSQL - that
> would mean PostgreSQL would become subject to GPL protection.

Not true--"mere aggregation" (shipping two things together) does not
require all the aggregated software to be GPL'd.  And you're not
linking to the gcj compiler, just running it.

This particular part of the problem is a non-issue.

-Doug


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rod Taylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 7.3B3 psql talking to a 7.2.3 server?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Fwd: Re: PG functions in Java: maybe use gcj?]