Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
| От | James Cloos |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m3aam2ui1o.fsf@jhcloos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: JC> That said, the possiblity of hex i/o format for the float datatypes JC> would be welcome. TL> It's unportable, for two different reasons: TL> 2. The printf specifiers you want us to rely on are not standard. They are in C99. TL> 1. pg_dump output would become platform-specific. This is highly TL> undesirable. It is true that pg would have to test for them in configure and supply alternative code wherever libc fails to support them. I can readily accept that there are many more pressing needs. But would such a patch for master be rejected? -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: