Re: two concurrency questions
| От | Doug McNaught |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: two concurrency questions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m365qyq4u8.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | two concurrency questions (Jeff Patterson <jpat@mpip.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Jeff Patterson <jpat@mpip.org> writes: > I searched the documentation and can't find the specific answers to > these questions. > > 1: Are user defined functions (eg pgplsql) atomic? I.e. if my function > updates a bunch of rows and one update fails for one reason or another > does it automatically roll-back to the state before the function was > called? Yes, because everything in PG is done inside a transaction, either implicitly or explicitly. If you have autocommit on and don't use BEGIN/COMMIT, each statement is its own transaction. Since a function is always called from a statement, functions are atomic. > 2: If an update causes a trigger and the trigger updates a row and the > trigger fails, what happens? Is there a way to atomize the whole > process? See the answer to #1. -Doug
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: