In the last exciting episode, ashah@tagaudit.com (Amit V Shah) wrote:
>> I am all for postgres at this point, however just want to know why I am
>> getting opposite results !!! Both DBs are on the same machine
>
>> Why do you say "opposite results" ?
>
> Please pardon my ignorance, but from whatever I had heard, mysql was
> supposedly always faster than postgres !!!! Thats why I was so
> surprised !! I will definately post the "analyze query" thing by
> end of today ...
There is a common "use case" where MySQL(tm) using the "MyISAM"
storage manager tends to be quicker than PostgreSQL, namely where you
are submitting a lot of more-or-less serial requests of the form:
select * from some_table where id='some primary key value';
If your usage patterns differ from that, then "what you heard" won't
necessarily apply to your usage.
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "acm.org")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/rdbms.html
The difference between a child and a hacker is the amount he flames
about his toys. -- Ed Schwalenberg