Re: .gitignore files, take two
| От | James Cloos |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: .gitignore files, take two |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m339seevst.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | .gitignore files, take two (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: .gitignore files, take two
Re: .gitignore files, take two |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I'm reading this a bit late, but... We (Xorg) found that ignoring: *~ *.bak *.patch in addition to the files generated by building is very helpful. We do use git tag and git describe in the make dist process, as well as git log >ChangeLog. That may be relevant; avoiding git describe's dirty designation is important when using it in that fashion. But it helps to be able to run git add --all cleanly. I understand that other git users have similar experience. -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: