Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> I think it's better to keep it working as a textual substitution.
> That poses the least risk of breaking scripts that work today ---
> who's to say that somebody might not be relying on the substitution
> happening someplace else than CREATE FUNCTION's shlib string?
Fair enough, I suppose. So +1 from me, FWIW.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support