Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> We could do something like
>
> PG_CONFIG = fake_intree_pg_config
> PGXS := $(shell $(PG_CONFIG) --pgxs)
> include $(PGXS)
There's something to that idea. Of course we would need to offer a
comment about the PG_CONFIG game and propose something else for real
world extensions (PG_CONFIG ?= pg_config).
> where fake_intree_pg_config is a purpose-built shell script that points
> to the right places inside the source tree.
If that works, that gets my preference over removing PGXS support in
contrib modules. Setting an example is important, in-tree build is not
a useful example for anyone but contributors to core.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support