Re: Finer Extension dependencies

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> At the very least, I would suggest that feature names are per-extension.
>
> Yeah, I had about come to that conclusion too.  A global namespace for
> them would be a mistake given lack of central coordination.

That's how I did it first, but Alvaro opposed to that because it allows
for more than one extension to provide for the same feature name.
 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-03/msg01425.php

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support