Re: Differentiating different Open Source databases
| От | Dimitri Fontaine |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Differentiating different Open Source databases |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m2oc33ot2d.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Differentiating different Open Source databases ("Nasby, Jim" <JNasby@enovafinancial.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Differentiating different Open Source databases
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
"Nasby, Jim" <JNasby@enovafinancial.com> writes: > An opinion I often run across when talking to database people who haven't > dealt with Postgres is "open source databases aren't very good". In all Well I'm not sure how closely related/relevant it is, but I find more and more people thinking they should take the NoSQL pill because frankly you only get so far with Oracle and MySQL. They should also hear the message that PostgreSQL is quite another beast, and its role into your software architecture can be very different from those first two. Because of technical facts and also licencing policies, of course. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: