Re: Finer Extension dependencies
| От | Dimitri Fontaine |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Finer Extension dependencies |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m2obrncn4p.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Finer Extension dependencies (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Finer Extension dependencies
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Why do features have OIDs? Is this for pg_depend entries? If so, would > it work to have pg_depend entries point to extensions instead? Yes, for pg_depend, no I don't know how to make that work with pointing to the extensions directly, because the whole point here is to be able to depend on a feature rather than the whole extension. Use cases: - depend on a feature f that appeared in version y of the extension (bugfix, new capability) - deprecate a feature: alter extension update removes a feature, you want to know that the dependent extensions need processing(cascade to remove them in the operation, or update them before hand, etc) (still manual operation though) I don't see how to handle those cases with a direct dependency on the extension rather than one of its features. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: