Re: machine-parseable object descriptions

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> I could also live with keeping the schema column as proposed, if people
> think it has a use, but letting it be redundant with a schema name
> included in the identity string.  But it seems like a bad idea to try to
> shear schema off of identity.

+1

Use case for keeping the extra column: replication to a federated
database where you want to tweak the target schema.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support