Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I can get behind this argument: force all stuff through ProcessUtility
>> for regularity, and not necessarily in the first patch for this feature.
>
> That seems like a pretty heavy dependency on an implementation detail
> that we might want to change at some point.
Given ProcessUtility_hook, how much of an implementation detail rather
than a public API are we talking about?
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support