Re: machine-parseable object descriptions

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> All in all, I'm happy with this and I'm considering committing it as
> soon as we agree on the set of columns.  I'm mildly on the side of
> removing the separate schema column and keeping name, so we'd have
> type/name/identity.

I would prefer that we keep the schema column, for easier per-schema
processing or filtering. It's way eaiser to provide it in a separate
column than to ask people to parse it back from the identity column.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support