Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Тема Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT
Дата
Msg-id m12FCP9-0003kMC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > I'd like to yank the END/ABORT commands, since they're non-standard and
> > redundant (COMMIT/ROLLBACK). Anyone who could not bear to see them go?
> > (Of course END would stay as a reserved word.)
> >
>
> We have to keep them in there for compatibility with older code.
   How long?
   IIRC,  CURRENT  has been replaced by OLD after I've fixed the   rewriter.  Both have been there between 6.4 and 6.5.
With6.5   CURRENT was gone.
 
   Of  course,  removing  END/ABORT will touch many applications   using transactions, but I would vote  for  it
anyway, since   it's standard.
 


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ed Loehr
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int??
Следующее
От: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys