Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit
| От | wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m11jinJ-0003kLC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Kristofer Munn <kmunn@munn.com> writes:
> > [PostgreSQL 6.5.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc egcs-2.91.66]
>
> But that's not very relevant to your real problem, which is that
> there must be something corrupted in pg_attribute's indexes.
>
> > What are the ramifications of continuing with the corrupted indexes -
> > undefined behavior?
>
> I wouldn't recommend it.
>
> > Filesystems have fsck to fix stuff - are there any
> > tools on the docket to reconstruct the indexes or other recoverable
> > things?
>
> I've thought for some time that vacuum ought to just rebuild the indexes
> from scratch. That'd provide a recovery path for this sort of problem,
> and I suspect it'd actually be faster than what vacuum does now. I'm
> not volunteering to make it happen, though.
I don't know if you could drop/rebuild an index on a system
catalog while the database is online.
But there was sometimes a utility called reindexdb. That used
the bootstrap processing mode interface of the backend to
drop and recreate all system catalog indices. I don't know
who removed that and why, neither do I know if it would still
be possible to drop and reindex through the bootstrap
interface.
Does someone remember why it's gone?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: