Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Who needs the pretty printed output of nodeDisplay() ?
> >
> > I find the output of nodeToString() much more useful when
> > debugging the rewrite system (especially when looking at
> > querytree's resulting from joins with many RTE's, Resdom's,
> > TLE's plus qual, group by etc. clauses. It's hard to keep
> > track where I am if the entire tree spans hundreds of lines.
> >
> > Thus I would like to change the output of -d4 back to that of
> > nodeToString(). Anyone against?
>
> I like the long pretty printing, with the indentation. You are
> suggesting going to the more compressed format. Can we have -d4 do
> compressed printing, and -d5 to pretty printing? That would be good.
Yepp - that's the right solution. Done soon!
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #