Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY
| От | D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m100kAR-0000bpC@druid.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] SUM() and GROUP BY ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Thomas G. Lockhart
> > So, again I agree with D'Arcy.
>
> I'm missing something. Is there another issue for GROUP BY for which we
> don't have a consensus? An aggregate on an entire column can return
> NULL, and aggregates on columns with GROUP BY columns of NULL should
> not.
Well, I still think that an aggregate on a whole column when no rows
are selected (None exist or WHERE clause deselects everything) should
return 0 rows, not NULL but the above would be better than what happens
now.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: