Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources
Дата
Msg-id ljlpkiao7pg7h36nql5ki7qb5cnvm34a2gnlfjp3kto2gbrbxl@kfqnxxbmr4vl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2025-10-21 12:02:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Benjamin Leff <benjamin.w.leff@gmail.com> writes:
> >> I believe the prevailing opinion was that the amount
> >> of time saved by not building all of PG didn't justify the maintenance
> >> effort to keep the build scripts working for that case
> 
> > IMO, it’s not just about time. For bare bones package managers when there’s
> > no need to build the server, this saves a few GB.
> 
> It's still fundamentally about trading off machine resources versus
> people time, though, and that tradeoff is not getting more attractive.

The impact really depends on what we define a client-only build as.

It'd not be hard at all to add a meta target that just builds a subset of the
tree. It'd be slightly harder, but still not that hard, to add a target to
install just a subset of libraries / binaries.

What would be a bit harder would be to add a configure-time switch to only
build client binaries. Mainly because, I think, it'd increase the test matrix
more than a dedicated build target would.

Benjamin, what precisely are you looking for with a client-only build?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: