Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com> writes:
>> Actually, if there were a working and maintained pg_upgrade, I'm pretty
>> sure nobody would use pg_dump as an upgrade facility anymore.
>
> You think so eh? Hint: the only workable design I've seen for pg_upgrade
> uses pg_dump as a component. It's much easier to handle
> version-to-version changes in pg_dump than it would be inside the server.
This discussion looks a bit weird to me since currently pg_dump IS
pg_upgrade; it's just misnamed.
Quite obviously it also implements pg_dumb_dump as a particular case.
Too bad the "real", simple pg_dumb_dump does not exist, it would have
been nice and useful to re-implement it in java.