Re: PostGIS in a commercial project
| От | Thomas Kellerer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostGIS in a commercial project |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | j84agp$6u1$1@dough.gmane.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PostGIS in a commercial project ("Tomas Vondra" <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Tomas Vondra wrote on 24.10.2011 20:11: > On 24 Říjen 2011, 19:44, Thomas Kellerer wrote: >> Pavel Stehule wrote on 24.10.2011 12:19: >>> there is not clean who is customer and what is one unit. If you >>> distribute PostGIS inside your application as one unit to customer, >>> then your application should to use GPL. >> >> So if we only distribute our application and require the customer to >> install Postgres and PostGIS, then it shold be fine? > > I think you should actually read GPL license, because you're obviously > confused by how it works - especially note the notion of "derived work". > > Derived work means that you take a GPL licensed software and modify it. In > this case you're required to distribute the source code (again under GPL) > to those who received the binary (legally). In case of PostGIS this would > mean you modify the PostGIS source code itself, which is very unlikely I > guess. Thanks. My understanding of "derived work" was, that anything that was "compiled" against a GPL licensed piece of software and thuswill *only* run with that software is considered "derived". If derived work only applies to changes of the original software,then this is of course no problem. Regards Thomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: