Re: PostgreSQL benchmarked on XFS vs ZFS vs btrfs vs ext4
| От | Ivan Voras |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL benchmarked on XFS vs ZFS vs btrfs vs ext4 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | j4qe8v$e7c$1@dough.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL benchmarked on XFS vs ZFS vs btrfs vs ext4 (Toby Corkindale <toby.corkindale@strategicdata.com.au>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 14/09/2011 09:30, Toby Corkindale wrote: > On 14/09/11 12:56, Andy Colson wrote: >> On 09/13/2011 08:15 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Some months ago, I ran some (probably naive) benchmarks looking at how >>> pgbench performed on an identical system with differing filesystems. >>> (on Linux). >>> > [snip] >> >> Did you test unplugging the power cable in the middle of a test to see >> which would come back up? > > Heh, no, but it'd be interesting to see.. > > I wonder if turning a virtual machine off has the same effect? No, never the exact same effect. There are two things to consider: if/when/how the OS flushes the data to the hardware and if/when/how the hardware flushes the data to physical storage. You can simulate only the failure of the first part with a virtual machine, but not the second (unless you bring down the VM host...).
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: