Re: Not to start a flame war but what does Oracle have that Postgresql does not?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Kellerer
Тема Re: Not to start a flame war but what does Oracle have that Postgresql does not?
Дата
Msg-id imd5v8$n0m$1@dough.gmane.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Not to start a flame war but what does Oracle have that Postgresql does not?  ("Rob Richardson" <Rob.Richardson@rad-con.com>)
Ответы Re: Re: Not to start a flame war but what does Oracle have that Postgresql does not?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-novice
Дерево обсуждения 
Rob Richardson, 23.03.2011 16:40:
> What do you mean by "real stored procedures"?  I only know PostGreSQL
> stored procedures.  What are they missing?
>
Postgres only has functions, no procedures.

It's not a big difference but there is one and basically anything you could do with a procedure you can also do a with
afunction. The call syntax is different. That reminds me of another thing that Oracle has: Packages - which are quite
niceto organize a large set of procedures and functions 

Regards
Thomas

В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Rob Richardson"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Not to start a flame war but what does Oracle have that Postgresql does not?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Not to start a flame war but what does Oracle have that Postgresql does not?