Please reply to the list with list business.
On 01/31/2011 03:22 PM, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> On 1/31/2011 7:28 AM, Lew wrote:
>> That seems a little harsh.
> Oh? How so?
>> You post to a discussion group but want to
>> suppress discussion?
>
> No, I just want to stick to the subject. My motivation for doing so, my
> unhappy childhood or somebody's need for attention are not too important. If
> you have had any experience with the product, I'd be extremely keen to learn
> about it and grateful to you for sharing it. If not, then....well, I'll
> explain my reasoning some other time. I have better things to do right now.
>
>> Maybe that works with paid tech-support staff, but here ...
>>
> Things have lived up to my expectation. Basically, the only people who replied
> are those who have no experience with the product but apparently do have an
> irresistible urge to discuss something that I am not particularly interested
> in discussing.
>
I'm so very, very sorry that we insist on having a discussion instead of
adhering to your ukase.
Perhaps your dictatorial attitude discourages people from responding? I mean,
Mark Felder asked a perfectly reasonable question and now you're all snarky.
Well, a big "Harrumph!" to that!
I wish you the best of luck. You'll need it with that attitude.
--
Lew
Ceci n'est pas une fenêtre.
.___________.
|###] | [###|
|##/ | *\##|
|#/ * | \#|
|#----|----#|
|| | * ||
|o * | o|
|_____|_____|
|===========|