Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)
Дата
Msg-id hvceozs7jbnycurw33cblufkhony3unoaigewew22vjvyta4mc@syjwlplmp566
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2025-02-24 13:52:51 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> The recent commits for this drew my attention to the comment for
> MAX_BACKENDS.  Specifically, it says we check the value in
> RegisterBackgroundWorker() (which appears to have been untrue since we
> added max_worker_processes) and relevant GUC check hooks (which I removed
> last year in commit 0b1fe14).  I wrote a short patch to fix this, which I
> intend to commit soon unless there is feedback.

Makes sense.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: