Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | gcjjfm54opgd4kohazc5sowpieta77sg7oywooaf75rux2hgky@qt6mqpfquuhj обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: BackgroundPsql swallowing errors on windows
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2025-02-14 08:14:45 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > It's been discussed before, but I'd really really like to get rid of > BackgroundPsql. It's ugly, non-intuitive and fragile. I agree, unfortunately we're stuck with this until we have a better alternative in tree :( > Last year I did some work on this. I was going to present it at Athens but > illness prevented me, and then other life events managed to get in my way. > But the basic work is around. See <https://github.com/adunstan/test-pq/commit/98518e4929e80fb96f210bbc5aab9fdcea058512> > This introduces a libpq session object (PostgreSQL::Test::Session) which can > be backed either by FFI or a small XS wrapper - the commit has recipes for > both. Missing is a meson.build file for the XS wrapper. There are > significant performance gains to be had too (poll_query_until is much nicer, > for example, as are most uses of safe_psql). If there is interest I will > bring the work up to date, and maybe we can introduce this early in the v19 > cycle. It would significantly reduce our dependency on IPC::Run, especially > the pump() stuff. I definitely am interested. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: