On 4/28/20 10:43 AM, Benjamin Schaller wrote:
> for an university project I'm currently doing some research on
> PostgreSQL. I was wondering if hypothetically it would be possible to
> implement a raw device system to PostgreSQL. I know that the
> disadvantages would probably be higher than the advantages compared to
> working with the file system. Just hypothetically: Would it be possible
> to change the source code of PostgreSQL so a raw device system could be
> implemented, or would that cause a chain reaction so that basically one
> would have to rewrite almost the entire code, because too many elements
> of PostgreSQL rely on the file system?
It would require quite a bit of work since 1) PostgreSQL stores its data
in multiple files and 2) PostgreSQL currently supports only synchronous
buffered IO.
To get the performance benefits from using raw devices I think you would
want to add support for asynchronous IO to PostgreSQL rather than
implementing your own layer to emulate the kernel's buffered IO.
Andres Freund did a talk on aync IO in PostgreSQL earlier this year. It
was not recorded but the slides are available.
https://www.postgresql.eu/events/fosdem2020/schedule/session/2959-asynchronous-io-for-postgresql/
Andreas