Re: Confused about stream replication protocol documentation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: Confused about stream replication protocol documentation
Дата
Msg-id ff8d6a2d-bd5a-362f-8e93-c4edc8b13f07@oss.nttdata.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Confused about stream replication protocol documentation  (Li Japin <japinli@hotmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Confused about stream replication protocol documentation  (Li Japin <japinli@hotmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 2020/12/23 11:08, Li Japin wrote:
> 
>> On Dec 22, 2020, at 11:13 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>> wrote:
>>
>> ‘B’ means a backend and ‘F’ means a frontend. Maybe as [1] does, we should
>> add the note like "Each is marked to indicate that it can be sent by
>> a frontend (F) and a backend (B)" into the description about each message
>> format for START_REPLICATION.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/protocol-message-formats.html
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/protocol-message-formats.html>
> 
> Thanks for your clarify.  Maybe we should move the "protocol message formats”
> before “stream replication protocol” or referenced it in "stream replication protocol”.

I like the latter. And maybe it's better to reference to also
"53.6. Message Data Types" there because the messages for
START_REPLICATION use the message data types.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Borisov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Automatic HASH and LIST partition creation
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fail Fast In CTAS/CMV If Relation Already Exists To Avoid Unnecessary Rewrite, Planning Costs