On 04.02.22 23:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Right. We've looked into that before --- when I made pg_namespace,
> I called it that because I thought we might be able to support
> nested namespaces --- but it'd really create a mess. In particular,
> the SQL standard says what a three-part name means, and this ain't it.
Modules are part of the SQL standard, so there is surely some
name-resolution system specified there as well.