Re: [HACKERS] Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Дата
Msg-id fd99bfaf-7047-c4ae-8d19-ec4b7ac23b11@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 4/5/17 12:26, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 4/5/17 09:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> - Maybe add a check to opr_sanity to make sure the default set of
>>>> functions is configured the way we want?
>>> That seems like a good idea.
>>
>> patch
> 
> LGTM

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan