Re: increasing HA
| От | Dimitri Maziuk |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: increasing HA |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | fd28cd15-6ef0-0dda-d3f1-25caa9e7c430@bmrb.wisc.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: increasing HA (Thomas Poty <thomas.poty@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 09/05/2018 12:04 PM, Thomas Poty wrote: > I want to get : > Automatic failover (promoting a slave) > Automatic Routing traffic to master > Fencing in case of node failure. Why would you want to fence a node that's already failed? -- You want to fence off the master during the failover so it does not accept any more DB updates. Anyway, here's how we run: - we provide services to customers; customer-facing service access points is where we want to reduce downtime. - We buy decent quality hardware with redundant disks and power circuits. 99.9999% of the downtime is maintenance reboots. - We carefully partition or services so that most of them require read-only access. Those run off slaves. - The master is not even visible to the customers. Its downtime does not affect service availability. Obviously, this works because we can run read-only. If you need read-write on a public-facing database, the above won't work for you. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: