Re: pg_checksums?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От b55white
Тема Re: pg_checksums?
Дата
Msg-id fcb350eb-c8b1-4f40-a3ff-0fbfa5b26a5f@edison
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_checksums?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-general
On Oct 30, 2023 at 7:00 PM, Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Michael,

> On Oct 30, 2023, at 01:56, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> > - Enable checksums on the previous primary.
> - Start the previous primary to be a standby of the node you failed
> over to.

That's exactly the reasoning behind my initial idea and question. Patroni does the switchover job for me including catching up on the latest changes, etc.

Seems that opinions vary. Are there any hard facts?

The best hard facts are those generated in your environment. 

It turns out that enabling checksums can take quite some time to complete, i.e. downtime for the application which is hard to do in a 24x7 environment.

Yes. Try it first with a smaller sample.

Cheers
Paul


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Help with a good mental model for estimating PostgreSQL throughput
Следующее
От: Luca Ferrari
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: xmax not zero?