Re: IPC::Run accepts bug reports
От | Alexander Lakhin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: IPC::Run accepts bug reports |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fb666566-32bb-9c36-9c2e-3949b7a061bc@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | IPC::Run accepts bug reports (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: IPC::Run accepts bug reports
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Noah, 16.06.2024 02:48, Noah Misch wrote: > I don't see in https://github.com/cpan-authors/IPC-Run/issues anything > affecting PostgreSQL. If you know of IPC::Run defects, please report them. > If I knew of an IPC::Run defect affecting PostgreSQL, I likely would work on > it before absurdity like https://github.com/cpan-authors/IPC-Run/issues/175 > NetBSD-10-specific behavior coping. It looks like a recent indri failure [1] revealed one more IPC::Run anomaly. The failure log contains: # Running: pgbench -n -t 1 -Dfoo=bla -Dnull=null -Dtrue=true -Done=1 -Dzero=0.0 -Dbadtrue=trueXXX -Dmaxint=9223372036854775807 -Dminint=-9223372036854775808 -M prepared -f /Users/buildfarm/bf-data/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/bin/pgbench/tmp_check/t_001_pgbench_with_server_main_data/001_pgbench_error_sleep_undefined_variable [22:38:14.887](0.014s) ok 362 - pgbench script error: sleep undefined variable status (got 2 vs expected 2) [22:38:14.887](0.000s) ok 363 - pgbench script error: sleep undefined variable stdout /(?^:processed: 0/1)/ [22:38:14.887](0.000s) not ok 364 - pgbench script error: sleep undefined variable stderr /(?^:sleep: undefined variable)/ [22:38:14.887](0.000s) [22:38:14.887](0.000s) # Failed test 'pgbench script error: sleep undefined variable stderr /(?^:sleep: undefined variable)/' # at t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl line 1242. [22:38:14.887](0.000s) # '' # doesn't match '(?^:sleep: undefined variable)' So the pgbench process exited as expected, stdout contained expected string, but stderr happened to be empty. Maybe such behavior is specific to macOS, and even on indri it's the only failure of that ilk out of 2000+ runs (and I couldn't reproduce this in a Linux VM), but I find this place in IPC::Run suspicious: sub _read { ... my $r = POSIX::read( $_[0], $s, 10_000 ); croak "$!: read( $_[0] )" if not($r) and !$!{EINTR}; That is, EINTR kind of recognized as an expected error, but there is no retry in this case. Thus, with the following modification, which simulates read() failed with EINTR: sub _read { confess 'undef' unless defined $_[0]; my $s = ''; - my $r = POSIX::read( $_[0], $s, 10_000 ); + my $r; +if (int(rand(100)) == 0) +{ + $r = 0; $! = Errno::EINTR; +} +else +{ + $r = POSIX::read( $_[0], $s, 10_000 ); +} croak "$!: read( $_[0] )" if not($r) and !$!{EINTR}; I can see failures like the one in question when running that test. Perhaps, I could reproduce the issue with a program, that sends signals to running (pgbench) processes (and thus interrupts read()), if it makes sense. What do you think? [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=indri&dt=2024-10-02%2002%3A34%3A16 Best regards, Alexander
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: