Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules

On 4/27/06, Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD  wrote:
> Can you please explain what exactly was not working ?
> xlc has in the past shown warnings that were actually problematic code
> that gcc did not show (and the cc variant of xlc also does not show).

This has nothing to do with warnings. With xlc version 6, this code:

Value *
makeString(char *str)
{Value	   *v = makeNode(Value);
v->type = T_String;v->val.str = str;return v;
}

Will return objects whose "type" field is T_Value (650), because the
compiler reorders the assignment that makeNode makes with that of the
main function.

--
Taral 
"You can't prove anything."   -- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem