Re: type cache cleanup improvements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrei Lepikhov
Тема Re: type cache cleanup improvements
Дата
Msg-id f8d8d179-ad31-4b46-aaef-3916be8bc8af@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: type cache cleanup improvements  (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>)
Ответы Re: type cache cleanup improvements
Список pgsql-hackers
On 21/10/2024 06:32, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> +static Oid *in_progress_list;
>> +static int    in_progress_list_len;
>> +static int    in_progress_list_maxlen;
> 
> Is there any particular reason not to use pg_list.h for this?
Sure. The type cache lookup has to be as much optimal as possible.
Using an array and relating sequential access to it, we avoid memory 
allocations and deallocations 99.9% of the time. Also, quick access to 
the single element (which we will have in real life almost all of the 
time) is much faster than employing list machinery.

-- 
regards, Andrei Lepikhov




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: