Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker

On 27/04/17 21:00, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/27/17 06:47, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> One thing I am missing in your patch however is cleanup of entries for
>> relations that finished sync. I wonder if it would be enough to just
>> destroy the hash when we get to empty list.
> 
> I had omitted that because the amount of memory "leaked" is not much,
> but I guess it wouldn't hurt to clean it up.
> 
> How about the attached?
> 

Yes that's more or less what I meant. All good.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services