Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f73f4287-aadd-4914-8052-76167fb4934c@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r) (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 18/09/2024 21:57, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:03:21AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 18.09.24 06:16, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: >>> +#define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r) \ >>> + do { \ >>> + /* We assume this initializes to zeroes */ \ >>> + static const s all_zeroes; \ >>> + r = (memcmp(addr, &all_zeroes, sizeof(all_zeroes)) == 0); \ >>> + } while (0) Not new with this patch, but do we guarantee padding bytes to be zeros? How about this instead: static inline bool pg_is_all_zeros(const char *p, size_t len) { for (size_t i = 0; i < len; i++) { if (p[i] != 0) return false; } return true; } Is there's a de facto standard name for that function? I was surprised that I couldn't find one with a quick google search. That seems like the kind of small utility function that every C program needs. How performance sensitive is this? If it's not, then the above seems like the most straightforward way to do this, which is good. If it is performance sensitive, it's still good, because the compiler can optimize that well: https://godbolt.org/z/x9hPWjheq. -- Heikki Linnakangas Neon (https://neon.tech)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: